|
This clinical consensus statement on vaginal energy-based devices (EBDs) reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society's (AUGS) EBD writing group. The writing group used a modified Delphi process to assess statements that were evaluated for consensus after a structured literature search. A total of 40 statements were assessed and divided into 5 categories: (1) patient criteria; (2) health care provider criteria; (3) efficacy; (4) safety; and (5) treatment considerations.
|